Handling of structure dereferencing
Tom Tromey
tromey@redhat.com
Thu Dec 6 15:41:00 GMT 2001
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
Daniel> Right now, and historically, gdb has accepted things like:
Daniel> struct foo {char a} *b, **c, ***d;
Daniel> (gdb) print b.a
Daniel> So, straw poll: how would people feel about:
Daniel> - not letting this happen; only explicit dereferencing
I use `p PTR.field' instead of `p PTR->field' all the time in gdb.
I'd prefer to keep it if possible.
However, I do notice that I only use this in the `b' case.
I don't recall ever using it when there is more than one level of
indirection involved.
Tom
More information about the Gdb
mailing list