fix sjlj eh vs dwarf2 debug
Jason Merrill
jason_merrill@redhat.com
Thu Aug 23 03:19:00 GMT 2001
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
>>>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 12:16:28PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>>>> * dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_frame_finish): Never emit .eh_frame
>>>> if USING_SJLJ_EXCEPTIONS.
>>
>>> Actually, I take that back. Now that we are (or may be) encoding
>>> .eh_frame data in non-standard ways, we should probably not try to
>>> emit only one of .eh_frame or .debug_frame. That way the debugger
>>> doesn't have to care about whatever funnies we do with augmentation.
>>
>>> Jason, what are your thoughts?
>> That makes sense to me. What do gdb folks think?
> This won't affect GDB(1). I'd go with what ever the current interpretation
> of the standards are.
.debug_frame is part of the DWARF 2 standard; .eh_frame is our own
modification of that format for use in a loaded section, for which there is
no standard but gcc.
Jason
More information about the Gdb
mailing list