Hmm, GCC are catching up :-)

[Jonathan Larmour]

In article < 3B7DF561.6070609@cygnus.com > you write:
>See:
>
>	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-08/msg00824.html
>
>GDB has been persuing this strategy for some time.

Won't this potentially cause undefined references at -O0? Or is
the point that GCC prunes dead code even at -O0?

Jifl
-- 
Red Hat, Rustat House, Clifton Road, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 (1223) 271062
Maybe this world is another planet's Hell -Aldous Huxley || Opinions==mine