extract_floating() vs floatformat_to_doublest()
Andrew Cagney
ac131313@cygnus.com
Wed Aug 1 16:00:00 GMT 2001
> Hello,
>
> Now that I've isolated the doublest code (doublest.[hc]), the next step is to rationalize the number of interfaces available for doing floating point conversion. Currently there are:
>
> floatformat_to_doublest()
> extract_floating()
> and
> floatformat_from_doublest()
> store_floating()
>
> I've two possabilities in mind:
>
> o dump extract/store floating
> (fixing floatformat_*_doublest())
>
> o dump floatformat_*_doublest
> (possibly replace *_floating()
> with extract,store_floatformat())
>
> my current preference is the former. Does anyone have a compelling argument for the latter?
To make this more concrete (and hopefully easier to understand :-) see
the attatched. It implements part of the former. It also illustrates
how everything should be routed through the host conversion routines
before falling back to the software FP conversion code.
Andrew
More information about the Gdb
mailing list