RDI over ethernet failure message
Shaun Jackman
sjackman@pathwayconnect.com
Wed Nov 1 10:06:00 GMT 2000
I'd be more than happy to. I've never contributed to a GNU project
before though. Could you point me to a "new contributors" faq?
Is it reasonable to diff against gdb-5.0 or do I need go to CVS?
Cheers,
Shaun
On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Shaun,
>
> I don't have any hardware that talks RDI over Ethernet arounf here,
> so I cannot reproduce the situation nor test any changes.
>
> Won't you consider submitting a patch yourself?
>
> Regards,
> Fernando
>
>
> Shaun Jackman wrote:
> >
> > The RDI over ethernet failure message should be a little more user friendly.
> > Also, it shouldn't exit gdb if it's unable to connect.
> >
> > GNU gdb 5.0
> > [clip]
> > This GDB was configured as "--host=i586-pc-linux-gnu --target=arm-elf"...
> > (gdb) ta rdi e=192.168.1.99
> > Fatal error: ethernet send failure [Invalid argument]
> > [gdb exits]
> >
> > The serial RDI message makes a lot more sense.
> >
> > GNU gdb 5.0
> > [clip]
> > This GDB was configured as "--host=i586-pc-linux-gnu --target=arm-elf"...
> > (gdb) ta rdi /dev/ttyS0
> > RDI_open: undefined error message, should reset target
> > RID_open failed
> > (gdb)
> >
> > --
> > Shaun
>
> --
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
>
>
>
More information about the Gdb
mailing list