Suggested (easier) fix to ... RE: Regressions problem (200 failures)

[Andrew Cagney]

Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 10:52:52AM +1000, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > So.  Does this mean I can delete:
> >
> > --
> >
> > Possible regressions with some devel GCCs.
> > http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ml/gdb/2000-q1/msg00475.html
> >
> > gcc-2.95.2 outputs a line note *before* the prologue (and one for the
> > closing brace after the epilogue, instead of before it...
> 
> I'm now fixed the epilogue part.  In addition, I tried to track
> down a close-brace line number to accompany early returns.  I.e.

Wow! Thanks.

	Andrew

>         ...
>         .stabn 68,0,8,$LM5
>         addl $2,1,$2
>         cmple $2,5,$1
>         bne $1,$L7
> $LM6:
>         .stabn 68,0,18,$LM6
>         ret $31,($26),1
>         .align 4
> $L3:
>         ...
>         .stabn 68,0,14,$LM9
>         addl $2,1,$2
>         cmple $2,5,$1
>         bne $1,$L13
> $LM10:
>         .stabn 68,0,18,$LM10
> $LBE2:
>         ret $31,($26),1
>         .end foo
> 
> Note the 18 before both return instructions.
> 
> r~