gdb seg violation during print command

[Daniel Berlin]

David Cogen <cogen@ll.mit.edu> writes:

> 
> I just downloaded, built, and tried GNU gdb 20000503. Now when I do print
> tteesstt11(1) I no longer get the seg violation in gdb. 
> 
> :)
> 
> But now the other problem surfaces: "Cannot resolve function tteesstt11 to any
> overloaded instance."
> 
> Apparently this problem was not related to class member functions (as I
> implied earlier) but is an inability to evaluate any call to a C++ function,
> even globals.
> 
> I also tried print ::tteesstt11(1); same error.

I get neither, as we've discussed.

> 
> :(
> 
> Any idea what this might mean? Should I write this up as a detailed bug
> report?


Can you send me an executable with debug info?
I can read any architecture, so sparc or whatever is fine.
I can determine if the problem is a bug in gdb, or the compiler's
debug info for you.


--Dan