[remote] Make registers network byteordered?

[Andrew Cagney]

"Frank Ch. Eigler" wrote:
> 
> Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> 
> : [..]
> : At present the target sends back registers in target byte order format
> : vis:
> :       T0525:c4060280ffffffff;1d:c0ffff81ffffffff;
> : I'd like to think about a [tweak] to this part of the protocol so that the
> : format:
> :       T0525=ffffffff80020664;1d=ffffffff81ffffc0;
> : is accepted.  [...]
> 
> How are gdb and the target supposed to pick the right scheme?  Do you
> imagine some sort of prior negotiation?

The ``='' vs the ``:''.

	Andrew