First release candidate for GDB 6.4 available

[Wu Zhou]

On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:53:50AM +0800, Wu Zhou wrote:
> > > ...
> > > > FAIL: gdb.cp/anon-union.exp: print w 1
> > > > FAIL: gdb.cp/anon-union.exp: print z 1
> > > > FAIL: gdb.cp/anon-union.exp: print w 2
> > > > FAIL: gdb.cp/anon-union.exp: print z 2
> > > > FAIL: gdb.cp/anon-union.exp: print w 3
> > > > FAIL: gdb.cp/anon-union.exp: print z 3
> > 
> > I guess that GDB don't know how to handle anonymous union yet.  I ever saw 
> > these failures in a few platform.  And also see them ok on others.  The 
> > difference I find is that some version of gcc handle the anonymous union 
> > members as normal variables, others don't. 
> 
> I believe this was a bug in GCC 4.x, very recently fixed in CVS.

Sorry.  What is a bug, handle the anonymous union as normal variable, or 
don't?

Regards
- Wu Zhou