[Bug ada/32766] Remove need to reconstruct Ada linkage names

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32766

--- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom Tromey <tromey@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=27de7d7bc3c16137f03a5be2d5da2b7687200eff

commit 27de7d7bc3c16137f03a5be2d5da2b7687200eff
Author: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Date:   Mon Mar 10 15:52:17 2025 -0600

    Add another minor hack to cooked_index_entry::full_name

    This patch adds another minor hack to cooked_index_entry::full_name.
    In particular, if GNAT emits non-hierarchical names (still the default
    as the hierarchical series is blocked on one tricky problem), then a
    request to compute the "linkage-style" name will now just return the
    'name' field.

    Without this tweak, this series would regress ada-cold-name.exp,
    because the search would look for "name.cold" but the index would
    return "name[cold]" as the "linkage" name (which would be wrong).

    This area is a bit difficult to unravel.  The best plan here, IMO, is
    to change Ada to work like the other languages in gdb: store the
    natural name and do searches with that name.  I think this is
    achievable, but I didn't want to try it here.

    I've updated the relevant bug (tagged below) to reflect this.

    Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32766
    Acked-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.