[Bug testsuite/31633] [gdb/testsuite] FAIL: gdb.server/server-kill-python.exp: ensure inferior is running

cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Wed Apr 17 09:44:57 GMT 2024


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31633

--- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries <vries@sourceware.org>:

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=75d277b1f506dcfbedfee3bef078dfe2b484958b

commit 75d277b1f506dcfbedfee3bef078dfe2b484958b
Author: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Date:   Wed Apr 17 11:45:02 2024 +0200

    [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdbserver pid in gdb.server/server-kill-python.exp

    The commit ed32754a8c7 ("[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.server/multi-ui-errors.exp
for
    remote target") intended to addresss the problem that this command:
    ...
    set gdbserver_pid [exp_pid -i $server_spawn_id]
    ...
    does not return the pid of the gdbserver for remote target, but rather the
one
    of the ssh client session.

    To fix this, it added another way of getting the gdbserver_pid.

    For the trivial case of non-remote target, the PID found by either method
    should be identical, but if we compare those by adding
    "puts [exec ps -p $gdbserver_pid]" we get:
    ...
      PID TTY          TIME CMD
    31711 pts/8    00:00:00 gdbserver
      PID TTY          TIME CMD
    31718 pts/8    00:00:00 server-kill-pyt
    ...

    The problem is that while the gdbserver PID is supposed to be read from the
    result of "gdb.execute ('p server_pid')" in the python script, instead it's
    taken from:
    ...
    Process server-kill-python created; pid = 31718^M
    ...

    Fix this by moving the printing of the gdbserver PID out of the python
script.

    Also double-check the two methods against each other, in the cases that
they
    should match.

    Tested on x86_64-linux.

    PR testsuite/31633
    https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31633

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


More information about the Gdb-prs mailing list