[Bug remote/18965] New: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent process ID
palves at redhat dot com
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Tue Sep 15 16:10:00 GMT 2015
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18965
Bug ID: 18965
Summary: new vforkdone stop reply should indicate parent
process ID
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: remote
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: palves at redhat dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The new vforkdone stop reply misses indicating the thread ID of the vfork
parent which the event relates to:
Note:
@cindex vforkdone events, remote reply
@item vforkdone
The packet indicates that a child process created by a vfork
has either called @code{exec} or terminated, so that the
address spaces of the parent and child process are no longer
shared. The @var{r} part is ignored. This packet is only
applicable to targets that support vforkdone events.
vs:
@cindex vfork events, remote reply
@item vfork
The packet indicates that @code{vfork} was called, and @var{r}
is the thread ID of the new child process. Refer to
@ref{thread-id syntax} for the format of the @var{thread-id}
field. This packet is only applicable to targets that support
vfork events.
Unfortunately, this is not just a documentation issue. GDBserver
is really not specifying the thread ID. In non-stop mode, gdb complains:
[Thread 6089.6089] #1 stopped.
#0 0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
0x0000003615a011f0 in ?? ()
(gdb) set debug remote 1
(gdb) c
Continuing.
Sending packet: $QPassSignals:e;10;14;17;1a;1b;1c;21;24;25;2c;4c;#5f...Packet
received: OK
Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
Notification received:
Stop:T05vfork:p17ce.17ce;06:40d7ffffff7f0000;07:30d7ffffff7f0000;10:e4c9eb1536000000;thread:p17c9.17c9;core:2;
Sending packet: $vStopped#55...Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $D;17ce#af...Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $vCont;c:p17c9.17c9#88...Packet received: OK
Notification received: Stop:T05vforkdone:;
No process or thread specified in stop reply: T05vforkdone:;
(gdb)
This is not non-stop-mode-specific, however. Consider e.g., that
in all-stop, you may be debugging more than one process at the
same time. You continue, and both processes vfork. So if you next
a T05vforkdone, there's no way to tell which of the parent processes
is done with the vfork.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Gdb-prs
mailing list