[Bug threads/18600] After forking and threads spawning, gdb leaves newly created threads stopped
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
sourceware-bugzilla@sourceware.org
Thu Aug 6 14:02:00 GMT 2015
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18600
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Pedro Alves <palves@sourceware.org>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f0ce0d3a331129309a46a6a9ac85fce35acae72b
commit f0ce0d3a331129309a46a6a9ac85fce35acae72b
Author: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Date: Thu Jul 23 16:01:01 2015 +0100
gdbserver: move_out_of_jump_pad_callback misses switching current thread
While hacking on the fix for PR threads/18600 (Threads left stopped
after fork+thread spawn), I once saw its test (fork-plus-threads.exp)
FAIL against gdbserver because move_out_of_jump_pad_callback has a
gdb_breakpoint_here call, and the caller isn't making sure the current
thread points to the right thread. In the case I saw, the current
thread pointed to the wrong process, so gdb_breakpoint_here returned
the wrong answer. Unfortunately I didn't save logs. Still, seems
obvious enough and it should fix a potential occasional racy FAIL.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.
gdb/gdbserver/ChangeLog:
2015-08-06 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
* linux-low.c (move_out_of_jump_pad_callback): Temporarily switch
the current thread.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Gdb-prs
mailing list