[PATCH] [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.exp on arm-linux with gcc 13
Tom de Vries
tdevries@suse.de
Mon Jan 20 04:42:17 GMT 2025
On 1/19/25 21:06, Alexandra Petlanova Hajkova wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 1:08 PM Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de
> <mailto:tdevries@suse.de>> wrote:
>
> On arm-linux, with target board unix/-mthumb, we get:
> ...
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.exp: continue to breakpoint:
> Break here
> p f1 (i1, i2)^M
> $1 = {a = -136274256}^M
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.exp: gdb-command<p f1 (i1, i2)>
> ...
>
> This is not a problem with the inferior call, which works fine:
> ...
> (gdb) p f1 (23, 100)
> $3 = {a = 123}
> ...
> but instead it's a problem with the location information:
> ...
> (gdb) p i1
> $1 = -136274356
> (gdb) p i2
> $2 = 100
> ...
> which tells us to find the value of i1 in (DW_OP_fbreg: -12).
>
> The test-case passes if we drop -fvar-tracking, in which case the
> debug info
> tells us to find the value of i1 in (DW_OP_fbreg: -20).
>
> This is with gcc 13.3.0 on Ubuntu 24.04. With gcc 14.2.0 on Debian
> testing,
> the code is the same, but -fvar-tracking does use the correct
> '(DW_OP_fbreg: -20)'.
>
> There seems to be some bugfix in -fvar-tracking for gcc 14.
>
> Workaround the bug by using constants 23 and 100 instead of i1 and
> i2 when
> using -fvar-tracking and gcc < 14.
>
> Tested on arm-linux.
>
> PR testsuite/32549
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32549 <https://
> sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32549>
>
> Hi,
>
> neat fix. I can confirm this brings no regressions for Fedora 42 aarch64.
Hi Alexandra,
thanks for checking.
I've pushed this now.
Thanks,
- Tom
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list