[PATCH 0/3] More AVX support improvements
Guinevere Larsen
guinevere@redhat.com
Wed Jan 15 11:56:19 GMT 2025
On 1/15/25 8:12 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> On 1/14/25 18:49, Guinevere Larsen wrote:
>> On 1/14/25 1:29 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Guinevere" == Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> writes:
>>> Guinevere> This series adds recording support to yet more AVX
>>> instructions. This
>>> Guinevere> series focuses on floating point instructions, since a
>>> check over the
>>> Guinevere> libraries I have installed in my fedora 40 machine shows
>>> that these are
>>> Guinevere> the most used missing instructions.
>>>
>>> I glanced through this and didn't see anything problematic. I didn't
>>> really review it in detail but I think you should check it in.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Tom
>>>
>> Thanks for the review, I've pushed these patches!
>>
>
> I see some new FAILs after these commits:
> ...
> FAIL: gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp: verify dyn_buf1 before vmovapd
> FAIL: gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp: verify dyn_buf1 before vmovupd
> FAIL: gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp: verify global_buf1 before vmovupd
> FAIL: gdb.reverse/i386-avx-reverse.exp: verify buf1 before vmovupd
> ...
>
> Filed at https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32561 .
>
> Thanks,
> - Tom
>
Huh, I'm very curious as to what's up.. Checking the log right now, thanks!
--
Cheers,
Guinevere Larsen
She/Her/Hers
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list