Follow up to stabs deprecation - AIX regressions
Kevin Buettner
kevinb@redhat.com
Thu Feb 13 17:43:21 GMT 2025
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 14:21:01 -0300
Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 2/13/25 1:48 PM, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:25:44 -0300
> > Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> * DWARF reading can sometimes fail in AIX. Currently, reading dwarf for
> >> xcoff inferiors is called on it's own, with no warning if dwarf fails
> >> (which probably makes sense, considering the default format in aix is
> >> still stabs). I added a warning when failing to read dwarf and noticed
> >> it being triggered on inferiors compiled with -gdwarf
>
> > I assume that you mean that stabs is the default when compiling with
> > gcc. Is stabs still also the default format for XLC (IBM Open XL C/C++) ?
>
> Yes, sorry, I meant gcc. The compile farm had versions 10 and 12, both
> with the same behavior.
>
> I don't think the compile farm has XLC compilers available for testing,
> or if they do I don't know how to use it, so I couldn't tell you...
I think it'd be good to find out XLC's preferred debug format. If it
uses/prefers DWARF, that'd be a good argument for gcc (on AIX)
switching to DWARF for it's preferred format too.
Kevin
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list