[PATCH] gdb/testsuite: rework bp-cond-failure to not depend on inlining

[Aktemur, Tankut Baris]

On Monday, September 23, 2024 12:41 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" <tankut.baris.aktemur@intel.com> writes:
> 
> > On Friday, September 20, 2024 9:11 PM, Guinevere Larsen wrote:
> >> On 9/20/24 3:55 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >> >>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:
> >> > Keith> On 9/20/24 9:20 AM, Guinevere Larsen wrote:
> >> >>> I've given some more thought and I think a couple of comments could
> >> >>> help anyway. Here's my suggestion, thought?
> >> > Keith> I am pleased to have an explanation there. Thank you!
> >> >
> >> > FWIW I read through this and it all seems fine to me as well.
> >> > Thanks for your review Keith.
> >> >
> >> > Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
> >> >
> >> > Tom
> >> >
> >> Thanks, pushed!
> >
> > I'm sorry to chime in late.  Just two comments, in case you'd want to consider
> > further edits.
> >
> >>> +      {debug c++}] == -1 } {
> >
> > It may make sense to rename the file extension to .cc.
> 
> Also, maybe if the test is now just C++, wouldn't moving it to gdb.cp/
> make sense?

FWIW, the test is using C++ only to be able to create two breakpoint locations
via function overloading.  A particular C++ feature is not being tested.  From
that perspective, IMHO it is fine that the test stays in the current folder.
But I also understand that it may be more practical to keep C++ tests in one
folder as much as possible.  There are 7 other .cc files in gdb.base.  If this
one is to be moved, maybe move those others, too?

-Baris



Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928