[PATCH 1/3] gdb: Make tagged pointer support configurable.

Willgerodt, Felix felix.willgerodt@intel.com
Wed May 22 13:37:28 GMT 2024


> > I feel like one of the main reasons for this patch is missing. That on x86 (or
> > some architectures in general) we want to avoid the overhead of doing this
> > unconditionally. E.g. as we don't want to parse a file repeatedly on x86.
> 
> I would add the following 2 sentences:
> 
> "This way, one can make sure that addresses are only adjusted when
> necessary.
> In case of LAM, this avoids unnecessary parsing of the /proc/<pid>/status file
> to
> get the untag mask."
> 
> Is the purpose more clear now?
> 

It is, thanks.

Felix
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Sean Fennelly, Jeffrey Schneiderman, Tiffany Doon Silva
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list