[PATCH 0/3] Fix thread exited messages for remote targets

[Andrew Burgess]

Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> writes:

> On 2023-08-21 10:31, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> The point of this series is to fix the thread ... exited messages for
>> remote targets.  I made a previous attempt to fix this issue:
>> 
>>   https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/0215c520c680334efac7f0544d834ec1fb7aff8e.1669634536.git.aburgess@redhat.com/
>>   https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/d6d49338119d2a32e060f95219aacac31bdf4886.1674207665.git.aburgess@redhat.com/
>> 
>> But Pedro hinted that he had a better solution as part of his step
>> over clone/exit work, the latest version of which can be found here:
>> 
>>   https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/20221212203101.1034916-31-pedro@palves.net/
>> 
>> Unfortunately, the larger series, of which that commit is a part,
>> seems to have stalled.  
>
> Yeah, sorry, I saw your reviews a few weeks ago, so I started reviewing your infcalls series as
> a way to "pay" for your reviews, before addressing your comments in my series, but
> then summer vacations and other priorities got in the way.  I still have every interest to get that
> series merged.
>
>> However, that particular patch doesn't really
>> depend on anything else in the series, and so, in this series I've
>> pulled out this one patch (3/3), along with one other patch on which
>> the above sort-of depended (1/3 - this changes a similar area of GDB).
>
> Thank you.
>
>> 
>> The remaining patch (2/3) is my own work, and is an additional
>> refactor which I think follows naturally from the first patch.
>> 
>> Patches #1 and #3 are mostly Pedro's work, though, some updates were
>> needed during the rebase.  Any bugs introduced by the rebase are mine.
>> 
>
> All looks good to me, please go ahead and merge it.

Pushed.

Thanks,
Andrew