[PATCH v5 0/3] RISC-V: Add 'Zmmul' extension
Tsukasa OI
research_trasio@irq.a4lg.com
Thu Sep 1 07:47:54 GMT 2022
On 2022/08/30 18:55, Nelson Chu wrote:
> Thanks, committed except the gdb-sim part, since I'm not the
> maintainer of gdb and sim, so I cannot approve the related stuff.
> Besides that, some minor failures of ld testcases which caused by m
> adding implicit zmmul. However, I also fix that since it's minor.
>
> Nelson
Thanks, and I resubmitted the sim part because it's now broken.
<https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-August/191609.html>
Tsukasa
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 9:59 AM Tsukasa OI via Binutils
> <binutils@sourceware.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi RISC-V folks,
>>
>> 'Zmmul' is a RISC-V extension consisting of only multiply instructions (a
>> subset of 'M'; multiply and divide instructions).
>>
>> This patch is PATCH v5 of the Zmmul support patchset primarily for Binutils
>> but also contains some GDB changes (a simulator fix and a new testcase).
>>
>> I completed the copyright assignment for my GDB contribution so minor
>> simulator changes are now safe enough to merge.
>>
>> Changed Project(s):
>> PATCH 1/3: Binutils
>> PATCH 2/3: Binutils and GDB (not to make "temporally broken" revision)
>> PATCH 3/3: Binutils
>>
>>
>> Note:
>> To confirm that the simulator is fixed, it requires another patch.
>> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-August/191564.html>
>> Without the patch above, 'Zmmul' extension will still work perfectly
>> (even the simulator). Still, testing whether the simulator works with this
>> extension (with `make check-sim') requires it.
>>
>>
>> Tracker on GitHub:
>> <https://github.com/a4lg/binutils-gdb/wiki/riscv_zmmul>
>> PATCH v1:
>> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121685.html>
>> PATCH v2:
>> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121791.html>
>> PATCH v3:
>> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-July/121810.html>
>> PATCH v4:
>> <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-August/122300.html>
>>
>>
>> This is based on the ISA Manual, draft-20220707-f518c25:
>> <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/releases/tag/draft-20220707-f518c25>
>> <https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/commit/f518c259c008f926eba4aba67804f62531b6e94b>
>>
>> This patchset also contains generic 'M' extension testcases as PATCH 1/3 (it
>> also tests for existence of the symbol `zmmul' so that it can also be a
>> base of 'Zmmul' testcases).
>>
>>
>> [Changes: v4 -> v5]
>>
>> - Clarify that PATCH 1/3 (new 'M' extension testcases) contains
>> preparation for the 'Zmmul' extension.
>>
>>
>> [BUG in PATCH v2 (fixed in v3): Simulator stopped working]
>>
>> The cause was simple. The RISC-V simulator supports I, M and A extensions
>> and the instruction is identified by those instruction classes:
>>
>> - INSN_CLASS_I (for 'I')
>> - INSN_CLASS_M (for 'M')
>> - INSN_CLASS_A (for 'A')
>>
>> I forgot to add INSN_CLASS_ZMMUL (also for 'M') to that list and that caused
>> multiply instructions to cause failure.
>>
>> PATCH v3 fixed that and I added a testcase (checks whether all RV32M
>> instructions run without any fault).
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tsukasa
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Tsukasa OI (3):
>> RISC-V: Add 'M' extension testcases
>> RISC-V: Add 'Zmmul' extension
>> RISC-V: Add 'Zmmul' failure testcases
>>
>> bfd/elfxx-riscv.c | 6 +++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/attribute-09.d | 2 +-
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-32.d | 18 +++++++++++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-64.d | 23 ++++++++++++++++
>> .../gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.d | 4 +++
>> .../gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.l | 14 ++++++++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.d | 4 +++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.l | 6 +++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.d | 4 +++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.l | 5 ++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.d | 4 +++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.l | 9 +++++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext.s | 21 +++++++++++++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/option-arch-02.d | 2 +-
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-32.d | 14 ++++++++++
>> gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-64.d | 15 +++++++++++
>> include/opcode/riscv.h | 1 +
>> opcodes/riscv-opc.c | 26 +++++++++----------
>> sim/riscv/sim-main.c | 1 +
>> sim/testsuite/riscv/m-ext.s | 18 +++++++++++++
>> 20 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-32.d
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-64.d
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.d
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-noarch-64.l
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.d
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-xlen-32.l
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.d
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-32.l
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.d
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext-fail-zmmul-64.l
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/m-ext.s
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-32.d
>> create mode 100644 gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/zmmul-64.d
>> create mode 100644 sim/testsuite/riscv/m-ext.s
>>
>>
>> base-commit: 27d582267a1d06e94661979f8893799ac235a768
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list