[PATCH] Improve clear command's documentation
Eli Zaretskii
eliz@gnu.org
Tue May 31 12:36:28 GMT 2022
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 12:05:53 +0100
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
>
> How about this, basically a complete rewrite of the clear command's
> documentation:
Thanks, the idea to rewrite it is indeed a good one. But the actual
text IMO came out highly repetitive, and has several markup issues.
Rather than commenting on each issue, I suggest the following reworded
text:
@item clear @var{locspec}
Delete any breakpoint whose code location corresponds to
@var{locspec}. @xref{Location Specifications}, for the various forms
of @var{locspec}. Which code locations correspond to @var{locspec}
depends on the form used in the location specifications @var{locspec}:
@table @code
@item @var{linenum}
@itemx @var{filename}:@var{linenum}
@itemx -line @var{linenum}
@itemx -source @var{filename} -line @var{linenum}
If @var{locspec} specifies a line number, with or without a file
name, the command deletes any breakpoint whose code location is
at or within the specified line @var{linenum} in files that match the
specified @var{filename}. If @var{filename} is omitted, it defaults
to the current source file.
@item *@var{address}
If @var{locspec} specifies an address, the command deletes any
breakpoint whose code location is at the given @var{address}.
@item @var{function}
@itemx -function @var{function}
If @var{locspec} specifies a function, the command deletes any
breakpoint whose code location is at the entry to any function whose
name matches @var{function}.
@end table
Ambiguity in names of files and functions can be resolved as
described in @ref{Location Specifications}.
WDYT?
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list