[PATCH] gdb/arm: d0..d15 are 64-bit each, not 32-bit
Luis Machado
luis.machado@arm.com
Thu May 26 07:39:05 GMT 2022
On 5/25/22 16:14, Yvan Roux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When unwinding the stack, the floating point registers d0 to d15
> needs to be handled as double words, not words.
needs -> need
>
> Only the first 8 registers has been confirmed fixed with this patch
> on a STM32F407-DISC0 board, but the upper 8 registers on Cortex-M33
> should be handled in the same way.
>
> The test consisted of running a program compiled with float-abi=hard.
> In the main function, a function took a double as an argument was
function took a double -> function taking a double?
> called. After the function call, a hardware timer was used to
> trigger an interrupt.
> In the debug session, a breakpoint was set in the function called
> from main to verify the content of the registers using "info float"
> and another breakpoint in the interrupt handler was used to check
> the same registers using "info float" on frame 2 (the frame just
> before the dummy frame created for the signal handler in gdb).
>
> Signed-off-by: Torbj�rn SVENSSON <torbjorn.svensson@st.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yvan Roux <yvan.roux@foss.st.com>
> ---
> gdb/arm-tdep.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> index 49664093f00..6c0aca274f5 100644
> --- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
> @@ -3464,10 +3464,10 @@ arm_m_exception_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame)
>
> /* Extended stack frame type used. */
> fpu_regs_stack_offset = unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x20;
> - for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
> {
> cache->saved_regs[ARM_D0_REGNUM + i].set_addr (fpu_regs_stack_offset);
> - fpu_regs_stack_offset += 4;
> + fpu_regs_stack_offset += 8;
> }
> cache->saved_regs[ARM_FPSCR_REGNUM].set_addr (unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0x60);
> fpu_regs_stack_offset += 4;
> @@ -3476,10 +3476,10 @@ arm_m_exception_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame)
> {
> /* Handle floating-point callee saved registers. */
> fpu_regs_stack_offset = 0x90;
> - for (i = 16; i < 32; i++)
> + for (i = 8; i < 16; i++)
> {
> cache->saved_regs[ARM_D0_REGNUM + i].set_addr (fpu_regs_stack_offset);
> - fpu_regs_stack_offset += 4;
> + fpu_regs_stack_offset += 8;
> }
>
> arm_cache_set_active_sp_value (cache, tdep, unwound_sp + sp_r0_offset + 0xD0);
Thanks. This is OK with the commit message nits fixed.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list