[PING] [PATCH v4 0/2] [gdb] untie and validate inheritance location
Bruno Larsen
blarsen@redhat.com
Wed May 11 11:12:00 GMT 2022
Ping
Cheers!
Bruno Larsen
On 4/27/22 09:28, Bruno Larsen wrote:
> Changelog for v4:
> * rebased on master
> * removed unnecessary checking after Simon's patch
>
> This started with what was thought of as an incorrect inheritance
> location expression, but turned out to be a correct, but unusual
> expression, and uncovered an incorrect assumption when calculating
> offsets of baseclasses.
>
> This patchset is the new iteration of that solution, that changed
> gnuv3_baseclass_offset calculation to allow for non-virtual inheritance
> that has a non-trivial location expression and also moved the basic
> validation to this function. The check in value_contents_copy_raw was
> changed to an assert.
> Finally, the test was expanded to have one incorrect trivial location,
> and two non-trivial location expressions, one correct and one incorrect.
>
> Bruno Larsen (2):
> [gdb] Untied inheritance virtuality and loc kind
> [gdb] Add Simple offset validation when calculating baseclass_offset
>
> gdb/gnu-v3-abi.c | 24 +-
> .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp | 233 +++++++++++++++++
> .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp | 235 ++++++++++++++++++
> .../gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c | 69 +++++
> gdb/value.c | 8 +-
> 5 files changed, 562 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-1.exp
> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr-2.exp
> create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.dwarf2/dw2-inheritance-locexpr.c
>
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list