[PATCH] Move 64-bit BFD files from ALL_TARGET_OBS to ALL_64_TARGET_OBS

Luis Machado luis.machado@arm.com
Thu May 5 09:06:26 GMT 2022


On 5/3/22 22:51, Luis Machado via Gdb-patches wrote:
> On 5/3/22 12:30, Luis Machado via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> On 5/3/22 12:24, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>> On 2022-05-03 12:19, Luis Machado via Gdb-patches wrote:
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>>   gdb/Makefile.in | 13 +++++++------
>>>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/gdb/Makefile.in b/gdb/Makefile.in
>>>> index 418094775a5..d80087749de 100644
>>>> --- a/gdb/Makefile.in
>>>> +++ b/gdb/Makefile.in
>>>> @@ -715,9 +715,12 @@ ALL_64_TARGET_OBS = \
>>>>       arch/aarch64-mte-linux.o \
>>>>       arch/amd64.o \
>>>>       arch/riscv.o \
>>>> +    bpf-tdep.o \
>>>>       ia64-linux-tdep.o \
>>>>       ia64-tdep.o \
>>>>       ia64-vms-tdep.o \
>>>> +    loongarch-linux-tdep.o \
>>>> +    loongarch-tdep.o \
>>>>       mips-fbsd-tdep.o \
>>>>       mips-linux-tdep.o \
>>>>       mips-netbsd-tdep.o \
>>>> @@ -734,7 +737,10 @@ ALL_64_TARGET_OBS = \
>>>>       sparc64-netbsd-tdep.o \
>>>>       sparc64-obsd-tdep.o \
>>>>       sparc64-sol2-tdep.o \
>>>> -    sparc64-tdep.o
>>>> +    sparc64-tdep.o \
>>>> +    tilegx-linux-tdep.o \
>>>> +    tilegx-tdep.o
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Spurious empty line.
>>
>> Fixed now.
>>
>>>
>>> In opcodes, tilegx is in TARGET32_LIBOPCODES_CFILES.  So why did we 
>>> need to move that one?
>>
>> *sigh*... I think that needs to be fixed as well.
>>
>> opcodes/disassemble.c defines ARCH_tilegx if BFD64 is defined, which 
>> makes it a 64-bit BFD target. So a 32-bit build makes it not register 
>> a disassembler function (leading to GDB internal errors).
>>
>> TILE-Gx is a 64-bit core according to 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TILE-Gx. So I suppose we need to move it 
>> from TARGET32_LIBOPCODES_CFILES to TARGET64_LIBOPCODES_CFILES.
> 
> Patch to binutils sent here: 
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2022-May/120651.html

I've pushed the binutils patch. Are there any objections to the gdb-side 
patch?


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list