[PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/literals.exp with aarch64

Luis Machado luis.machado@arm.com
Wed Jul 27 13:31:08 GMT 2022


On 7/27/22 11:34, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On aarch64-linux, I run into:
> ...
> (gdb) print 16#ffffffffffffffff#^M
> $7 = 18446744073709551615^M
> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.ada/literals.exp: print 16#ffffffffffffffff#
> ...
> while on x86_64-linux instead, I get:
> ...
> (gdb) print 16#ffffffffffffffff#^M
> $7 = -1^M
> (gdb) PASS: gdb.ada/literals.exp: print 16#ffffffffffffffff#
> ...
> 
> We can easily reproduce this on x86_64-linux using:
> ...
> $ gdb -q -batch -ex "set lang ada" -ex "set arch i386" \
>    -ex "print 16#ffffffffffffffff#"
> $1 = -1
> $ gdb -q -batch -ex "set lang ada" -ex "set arch aarch64" \
>    -ex "print 16#ffffffffffffffff#"
> $1 = 18446744073709551615
> ...
> 
> With i386, we have:
> ...
> (gdb) p int_bits
> $3 = 32
> (gdb) p long_bits
> $4 = 32
> (gdb) p long_long_bits
> $5 = 64
> ...
> and so in processInt we hit the fits-in-unsigned-long-long case where we use
> as type long long:
> ...
>        /* Note: Interprets ULLONG_MAX as -1.  */
>        yylval.typed_val.type = type_long_long (par_state);
> ...
> 
> With aarch64, we have instead:
> ...
> (gdb) p int_bits
> $1 = 32
> (gdb) p long_bits
> $2 = 64
> (gdb) p long_long_bits
> $3 = 64
> ...
> and so in processInt we hit the fits-in-unsigned-long case where we use
> as type unsigned long:
> ...
>        yylval.typed_val.type
>          = builtin_type (par_state->gdbarch ())->builtin_unsigned_long;
> ...
> 
> Fix this by updating the test-case to accept 18446744073709551615 as well.
> 
> Tested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux.
> 
> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29416
> 
> Any comments?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Tom
> 
> [gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.ada/literals.exp with aarch64
> 
> ---
>   gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/literals.exp | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/literals.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/literals.exp
> index a6ac89b540f..744a6bc573c 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/literals.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/literals.exp
> @@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ gdb_test "print 16#f#e1" " = 240"
>   gdb_test "print 16#1#e10" " = 1099511627776"
>   
>   gdb_test "print/x 16#7fffffffffffffff#" " = 0x7fffffffffffffff"
> -gdb_test "print 16#ffffffffffffffff#" " = -1"
> +gdb_test "print 16#ffffffffffffffff#" " = (-1|18446744073709551615)"

LGTM

Thanks for investigating this.


More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list