Fw: RE: [PATCH] Use current_inferior ()->pid for AIX
Simon Marchi
simark@simark.ca
Mon Jul 4 19:28:53 GMT 2022
On 6/27/22 08:55, Aditya Vidyadhar Kamath via Gdb-patches wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have worked our way out through the pid!=0 assertion failure.
>
> Currently we also plan to come out soon with the patches for fork support as well in AIX.
>
> It will be great if we could get a review to the patch [Forwarded in this email] whenever you find time.
>
> Have a nice day ahead.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Aditya
Hi Aditya,
I looked at your patch, and unfortunately I don't understand how it
improves things. In my past messages, I tried to explain that the root
of the problem is that the wait methods code is relying on the entry
value of inferior_ptid, when it shouldn't. I don't see how adding one
more reference to inferior_ptid in rs6000_nat_target::wait helps.
Given your goal is to support forks (and thus multi-process, I
suppose?), try to write the code in the wait method in such a way that
it doesn't rely on the inferior_ptid value or current inferior value on
entry. The typical pattern for the wait methods is that they fetch some
event (using waitpid in your case) and then figure out which inferior
from the inferior list this event applies to.
Simon
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list