[PATCH] [AArch64] Fix PR gdb/28681
Luis Machado
luis.machado@linaro.org
Tue Jan 4 18:44:38 GMT 2022
On 1/4/22 3:09 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
>
>
> On 2022-01-04 12:22, Luis Machado via Gdb-patches wrote:
>> This is the same as commit b1718fcdd1d2a5c514f8ee504ba07fb3f42b8608, but
>> fixing things for AArch64.
>>
>> With the patch, gdb.cp/non-trivial-retval.exp has full passes on
>> AArch64-Linux Ubuntu 20.04/18.04.
>> ---
>> gdb/aarch64-tdep.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
>> index 70fb66954a4..802762f303c 100644
>> --- a/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
>> +++ b/gdb/aarch64-tdep.c
>> @@ -2323,6 +2323,15 @@ aarch64_extract_return_value (struct type *type, struct regcache *regs,
>> valbuf += X_REGISTER_SIZE;
>> }
>> }
>> + else if (!language_pass_by_reference (type).trivially_copyable)
>> + {
>> + /* If the object is a non-trivial C++ object, the result is passed as a
>> + pointer stored in X0. */
>> + CORE_ADDR addr;
>> +
>> + regs->cooked_read (AARCH64_X0_REGNUM, &addr);
>> + read_memory (addr, valbuf, TYPE_LENGTH (type));
>> + }
>> else
>> {
>> /* For a structure or union the behaviour is as if the value had
>
> I'll let somebody else review this (probably Andrew), but please change the
> patch subject to something descriptive, not just the bug number.
Did you want the entire bugzilla PR subject or something else? I can't
really tell from your reply, sorry.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list