[PATCH 0/4] Add variant type
Simon Marchi
simon.marchi@polymtl.ca
Thu Feb 3 01:32:45 GMT 2022
On 2022-02-02 19:02, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> * Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> [2022-02-01 09:07:13 -0500]:
>
>> I sometimes encounter situations where I think using std::variant would
>> be useful. The benefits would be to be able to use non-POD types in the
>> alternatives, have them automatically constructed when making an
>> alternative active, and automatically destructing them when switching to
>> another alternative of destroying the variant. Also, the validation of
>> access to the alternatives, to prevent accessing an alternative that is
>> not the current one.
>>
>> However, std::variant is only available in C++17. I suggest that we
>> import a variant implementation to allow us to use it right now, a bit
>> like we did for optional and string_view. We could maybe import the
>> implementation from libstdc++, like we did for these last two types, but
>> that sounds really tedious (we would also want to import any tests).
>> Instead, we can take advantage of a popular implementation distributed
>> as a single header file. I chose this one:
>>
>> https://github.com/martinmoene/variant-lite
>>
>> because it is close to the std implementation, and the license (Boost
>> Software License) is clear and compatible with the GPL v3.
>
> Is this compatible with the copyright assignment requirement of
> contributing to GDB?
>
> I'm assuming copyright of that file is not assigned to FSF.
Exactly, we're merely redistributing it (as its license allows). Its
header does not say "Copyright FSF" like the other files.
> My concern would be, what if code was copied from that file into the
> rest of GDB? Does that cause us problems?
Well, we should avoid that :). I see it exactly like zlib, which is also bundled.
Simon
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list