[PATCH v2 2/2] ppc: recognize all program traps
Pedro Alves
pedro@palves.net
Tue Nov 30 12:17:35 GMT 2021
On 2021-11-24 13:09, Jan Vrany via Gdb-patches wrote:
> +# Number of expected SIGTRAP's to get. This needs to be kept in sync
> +# with the source file.
> +set expected_traps 3
> +set keep_going 1
> +set count 0
> +
> +# Make sure we have a lower timeout in case GDB doesn't support a particular
> +# instruction. Such instruction will cause GDB to loop infinitely.
> +while {$keep_going} {
> + # Continue to next program breakpoint instruction.
> + gdb_test_multiple "continue" "trap instruction $count causes SIGTRAP" {
> + -re "Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $" {
> + pass $gdb_test_name
> +
> + # Advance PC to next instruction
> + gdb_test "set \$pc = \$pc + 4" "" "advance past trap instruction $count"
> +
> + incr count
> + }
> + # We've reached the end of the test.
> + -re "exited with code 01.*$gdb_prompt $" {
> + set keep_going 0
> + }
> + timeout {
> + fail $gdb_test_name
> + set keep_going 0
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
This while loop will iterate forever if gdb_test_multiple trips on some internal match, like
some unexpected text out of gdb that ends with a prompt, or an internal error. The logic of
"keep_going" should be reversed so that the loop breaks if anything goes wrong. Also, the
last continue to "exited with code 01" doesn't itself issue a pass unlike the other continues,
which seems inconsistent. BTW, if we flip the logic, we no longer need the timeout check.
Something like this (completely untested):
~~~~~~~~~~~~
# Number of expected SIGTRAP's to get. This needs to be kept in sync
# with the source file.
set expected_traps 3
set count 0
set keep_going 1
# Make sure we have a lower timeout in case GDB doesn't support a particular
# instruction. Such instruction will cause GDB to loop infinitely.
while {$keep_going} {
set keep_going 0
# Continue to next program breakpoint instruction.
gdb_test_multiple "continue" "trap instruction $count causes SIGTRAP" {
-re "Program received signal SIGTRAP, Trace/breakpoint trap.*$gdb_prompt $" {
pass $gdb_test_name
# Advance PC to next instruction
gdb_test "set \$pc = \$pc + 4" "" "advance past trap instruction $count"
incr count
if {$count < $expected_traps} {
set keep_going 1
}
}
}
# Verify we stopped at the expected number of SIGTRAP's.
gdb_assert {$count == $expected_traps} "all trap instructions triggered"
# One last continue to reach the end of the test, to make sure we don't get
# another SIGTRAP.
gdb_test "continue" "exited with code 01.*" "continue to end"
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Some thing in the other file. Or you could merge the files, and make the exp file
set a different .S filename and different "expected_traps" depending on arch, to
avoid duplication.
BTW, I don't understand what the "Make sure we have a lower timeout" comment is referring
to -- I don't see anything changing the timeout.
BTW², seems strange to expect that the program exits with exit code 1 instead of 0 on a success run.
I can't write PPC assembly to save my life, but I don't see any "1", or writing to r3 in in
the assembly, so I guess that is assuming the value is already 1 on entry. I wonder whether that's a
good assumption in all environments.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list