[PATCH][gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp
Tom de Vries
tdevries@suse.de
Tue Jan 26 18:04:12 GMT 2021
Hi,
When running test-case gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp with target board unix/-m32, I get:
...
(gdb) up 3^M
79 abort.c: No such file or directory.^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp: shift up to the modified frame
...
The preceding backtrace looks like this:
...
(gdb) bt^M
#0 0xf7fcf549 in __kernel_vsyscall ()^M
#1 0xf7ce8896 in __libc_signal_restore_set (set=0xffffc3bc) at \
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/internal-signals.h:104^M
#2 __GI_raise (sig=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:47^M
#3 0xf7cd0314 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79^M
#4 0x0804919f in gate (gate=0x8049040 <abort@plt>, data=0x0) at gate.c:3^M
#5 0x08049176 in main () at i386-gnu-cfi.c:27^M
...
with function gate at position #4, while on another system where the test passes,
I see instead:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp: continue to abort()
backtrace^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp: backtrace
...
function gate at position #3.
Fix this by capturing the position of function gate in the backtrace, and
using that in the rest of the test instead of hardcoded constant 3.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
Any comments?
Thanks,
- Tom
[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2021-01-26 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp: Capturing the position of function gate
in the backtrace, and use that in the rest of the test instead of
hardcoded constant 3.
---
gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp | 22 +++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp
index 4228140fc35..8f6fbb8bf44 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.arch/i386-gnu-cfi.exp
@@ -60,19 +60,31 @@ gdb_test_multiple {} "continue to abort()" {
# Backtrace would crash before.
-gdb_test "bt" \
- "main \\(\\) at .*${testfile}.c.*" \
- "backtrace"
+set gate_n ""
+set backtrace_re \
+ [multi_line \
+ "" \
+ "#($decimal) *$hex in gate \[^\r\n\]*" \
+ "#$decimal *$hex in main \\(\\) at .*${testfile}.c.*"]
+gdb_test_multiple "backtrace" "" {
+ -re -wrap $backtrace_re {
+ set gate_n $expect_out(1,string)
+ pass $gdb_test_name
+ }
+}
+if { $gate_n == "" } {
+ return -1
+}
# Check we see the inserted `DW_CFA_GNU_negative_offset_extended' CFI.
# We see there the original CFI-stored filename `gate.c'.
-gdb_test "up 3" \
+gdb_test "up $gate_n" \
"gate \\(\[^()\]*\\) at .*gate.c.*" \
"shift up to the modified frame"
gdb_test_multiple "info frame" "existence of the CFI inserted register" {
- -re "Stack level 3, frame at (0x\[0-9a-f\]+):.*Saved registers:.* ecx at (0x\[0-9a-f\]+),.*" {
+ -re "Stack level $gate_n, frame at (0x\[0-9a-f\]+):.*Saved registers:.* ecx at (0x\[0-9a-f\]+),.*" {
pass "existence of the CFI inserted register"
if { [string compare $expect_out(1,string) $expect_out(2,string)] } then {
fail "value of the CFI inserted register"
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list