[PATCH 3/8] Introduce gdb-specific %p format suffixes

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> writes:

Andreas> On Sep 27 2019, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> void
>> vfprintf_filtered (struct ui_file *stream, const char *format, va_list args)
>> {
>> -  vfprintf_maybe_filtered (stream, format, args, 1);
>> +  vfprintf_maybe_filtered (stream, format, args, true, true);
>> }

>> void
>> vprintf_filtered (const char *format, va_list args)
>> {
>> -  vfprintf_maybe_filtered (gdb_stdout, format, args, 1);
>> +  vfprintf_maybe_filtered (gdb_stdout, format, args, true, false);
>> }

Andreas> Why is vprintf_filtered different from vfprintf_filtered (gdb_stdout)?

I don't know.  Changing that 'false' to 'true' doesn't cause any
regressions.  And abstractly that seems like the right thing to do.
There's another thread about this as well, I'll reply there too.

Tom