Propose GDB 10 branch this Fri-Sun (Sep 11-13) [2020-09-05 Update]

[Kamil Rytarowski]

On 08.09.2020 15:49, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> I think that's reasonable.  I just finished taking a look, I did review it
>> as best as I could.  There's not much risk in merging it, and the sooner this
>> is available upstream, the better, so I think we should just go ahead with it.
>>
>> Of course, the more pair of eyes on the code the better, so if somebody else
>> wants to take a look, go ahead.
>>
>> I would also consider including the gdbserver support for ARC, with the same
>> logic.  But I don't think that has to block the branch creation, we can easily
>> cherry-pick it.
> 
> I'm not opposed to these going into GDB 10 on the basis that they
> are isolated pieces of code that can't affect the rest. On the other
> hand, if those can be safely pushed at the last minute, they should
> also be cherry-pickable on the branch, so given the very large delay
> the branching has already suffered, I would not delay branching
> for this new feature further. We can simply cherry-pick those later.
> Would that be acceptable?
> 

Personally, I consider the patchset to be ready to merge, but it depends
on the reviewers with approval privilege.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/attachments/20200908/10a6cecc/attachment.sig>