[RFA 1/2] Fix TARGET_CHAR_BIT/HOST_CHAR_BIT confusion in gmp-utils.c
Joel Brobecker
brobecker@adacore.com
Sun Nov 29 15:45:56 GMT 2020
In a couple of gdb_mpz methods, we are computing the number of
bits in a gdb::array_view of gdb_byte. Since gdb_byte is defined
using a host-side type (see common-types.h), the number of bits
in a gdb_byte should be HOST_CHAR_BIT, not TARGET_CHAR_BIT.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* gmp-utils.c (gdb_mpz::read): Use HOST_CHAR_BIT instead of
TARGET_CHAR_BIT.
(gdb_mpz::write): Likewise.
---
gdb/gmp-utils.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/gmp-utils.c b/gdb/gmp-utils.c
index 7994108..e3a3333 100644
--- a/gdb/gmp-utils.c
+++ b/gdb/gmp-utils.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ gdb_mpz::read (gdb::array_view<const gdb_byte> buf, enum bfd_endian byte_order,
was in fact negative, we need to adjust VAL accordingly. */
gdb_mpz max;
- mpz_ui_pow_ui (max.val, 2, buf.size () * TARGET_CHAR_BIT - 1);
+ mpz_ui_pow_ui (max.val, 2, buf.size () * HOST_CHAR_BIT - 1);
if (mpz_cmp (val, max.val) >= 0)
mpz_submul_ui (val, max.val, 2);
}
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ gdb_mpz::write (gdb::array_view<gdb_byte> buf, enum bfd_endian byte_order,
would be the same as our negative value. */
gdb_mpz neg_offset;
- mpz_ui_pow_ui (neg_offset.val, 2, buf.size () * TARGET_CHAR_BIT);
+ mpz_ui_pow_ui (neg_offset.val, 2, buf.size () * HOST_CHAR_BIT);
mpz_add (exported_val.val, exported_val.val, neg_offset.val);
}
--
2.1.4
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list