[pushed] Fix comment in ada-typeprint.c
Tom Tromey
tromey@adacore.com
Wed Mar 11 14:31:08 GMT 2020
A comment in ada-typeprint.c mentions the Unchecked_Variant pragma.
However, this does not exist, and the comment should actually mention
Unchecked_Union.
gdb/ChangeLog
2020-03-11 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
* ada-typeprint.c (print_choices): Fix comment.
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 4 ++++
gdb/ada-typeprint.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ada-typeprint.c b/gdb/ada-typeprint.c
index db4634c0f3b..9f0ac259a16 100644
--- a/gdb/ada-typeprint.c
+++ b/gdb/ada-typeprint.c
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ print_array_type (struct type *type, struct ui_file *stream, int show,
values. Return non-zero if the field is an encoding of
discriminant values, as in a standard variant record, and 0 if the
field is not so encoded (as happens with single-component variants
- in types annotated with pragma Unchecked_Variant). */
+ in types annotated with pragma Unchecked_Union). */
static int
print_choices (struct type *type, int field_num, struct ui_file *stream,
--
2.21.1
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list