[pushed] Fix comment in ada-typeprint.c

Tom Tromey tromey@adacore.com
Wed Mar 11 14:31:08 GMT 2020


A comment in ada-typeprint.c mentions the Unchecked_Variant pragma.
However, this does not exist, and the comment should actually mention
Unchecked_Union.

gdb/ChangeLog
2020-03-11  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>

	* ada-typeprint.c (print_choices): Fix comment.
---
 gdb/ChangeLog       | 4 ++++
 gdb/ada-typeprint.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/ada-typeprint.c b/gdb/ada-typeprint.c
index db4634c0f3b..9f0ac259a16 100644
--- a/gdb/ada-typeprint.c
+++ b/gdb/ada-typeprint.c
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ print_array_type (struct type *type, struct ui_file *stream, int show,
    values.  Return non-zero if the field is an encoding of
    discriminant values, as in a standard variant record, and 0 if the
    field is not so encoded (as happens with single-component variants
-   in types annotated with pragma Unchecked_Variant).  */
+   in types annotated with pragma Unchecked_Union).  */
 
 static int
 print_choices (struct type *type, int field_num, struct ui_file *stream,
-- 
2.21.1



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list