[PATCH] Fix printf of a convenience variable holding an inferior address

[Sergio Durigan Junior]

On Saturday, March 07 2020, Joel Brobecker wrote:

>> Yeah, this is a regression.  GDB 8.3 worked fine.
>
> OK. Thanks for confirming, Sergio.
>
>> > In terms of putting it in 9.2, I think we could do it; the patch
>> > does look safe to me.
>> 
>> Cool.  So, is the process the same (now that we're using a different
>> versioning scheme)?  Do I just open a bug again 9.1 and push the
>> backported patch to the branch?
>
> Correct :). If you don't mind, it might be useful to amend the
> ChangeLog entry in master to include the PR number.

Alright, I just pushed a new commit to the gdb-9-branch:

https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=141e490226a99e0359393ddaca5628c68de036dc

The bug is:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25650

I didn't set the Target Milestone there because I didn't see a "9.2" (or
"9.1.1"?) option.

Let me know if there's anything else I need to do :-).

> Thanks Sergio!

Thank you!

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/