libctf compilation failure on MinGW
Eli Zaretskii
eliz@gnu.org
Sat Jul 4 18:19:16 GMT 2020
> From: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2020 19:16:22 +0100
>
> > GDB is about to branch for the imminent GDB 10.1 release, and
> > currently the problems I described back then are still with us.
>
> Oh, I thought you pushed a fix already! Sorry!
We did, but only on the-then GDB 9.1 branch. The master branch wasn't
changed, as we expected to have you update the upstream with the
proper solution.
> I'll post a fix sticking suitable E* #defines in once I get back from
> holiday on Tuesday.
>
> > we'd like a solution soon, and need to decide whether to go with the
> > same workaround we used for GDB 9.1 or use a better change from you.
>
> I think that workaround is in hindsight better than the change I
> proposed, and should go in trunk. :/
Thanks.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list