[PATCH] sim: don't rely on inferior_ptid in gdbsim_target::wait

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Mon Jan 20 15:28:00 GMT 2020


On 1/20/20 12:48 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2020-01-19 4:12 p.m., Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> * Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> [2020-01-18 22:55:57 -0500]:
>>
>>> When running a program with the simulator target, I get:
>>>
>>>     /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/inferior.c:279: internal-error: inferior* find_inferior_pid(process_stratum_target*, int): Assertion `pid != 0' failed.
>>>
>>> This can be reproduced by building a GDB for --target=arm-none-gnueabi,
>>> and running with
>>>
>>>     $ ./gdb -nx --data-directory=data-directory a.out -ex "target sim" -ex load -ex "b main" -ex r
>>>
>>> Where a.out is any program with a main.
>>>
>>> The problem is that gdbsim_target::wait assumes that inferior_ptid has
>>> the value of the thread it wants to report an event for.
>>>
>>> Actually, it's the target's responsibility to come up with the ptid of
>>> the thread the event is for.  In the sim target, that ptid is stored in
>>> sim_inferior_data::remote_sim_ptid, so return that instead of
>>> inferior_ptid.
>>>
>>> ChangeLog:
>>>
>>> 	* remote-sim.c (gdbsim_target::wait): Return
>>> 	sim_data->remote_sim_ptid instead of inferior_ptid.
>>
>> This makes sense.  LGTM.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrew
> 
> Thanks, I pushed it.

Thanks for doing this.  This was a recent assertion I added with
the multi-target work.  It's possibly (and likely) that other ports
will need similar adjustments, but it's hard to tell with actually
running into the issue.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list