[PATCH v2 0/6] Move gdbsupport to top level

[Pedro Alves]

On 1/17/20 2:10 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2020-01-17 8:35 a.m., Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>> So the original solution of adding the gnulib dir to the include path
>>>> isn't that bad, though I call it a hack.
>>>
>>> I would have to see it, but it sounds like the simplest solution.
>>
>> It was the first patch I posted, here:
>>  https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2020-01/msg00419.html
> 
> Ok thanks, I did not follow this story from the beginning.
> 
>> But, gosh makes me realize there's an even simpler solution...
>> Just rename support-config.h to config.h...  Do we need to call
>> it something else for some reason?  I couldn't find one.
> 
> That's a good idea.
> 
>>>
>>>>> The gdb-config.h above should be gdbserver-config.h.
>>>> Here's v2.  WDYT?  Which of all the approaches discussed would
>>>> you prefer?
>>>
>>> Probably the solution that involves the least files and indirections.  But
>>> the one proposed in the latest patch is fine with me too.  It's set and
>>> forget, once it builds again we won't think about it, at least until the
>>> next time it breaks.
>>
>> Note that we already kind of have the config.h indirections via common-defs.h,
>> where we include the multiple config.h files.  This just moves those
>> indirections to the file actually named config.h.
>>
>>> The buildbot is struggling with this (sending many breakage emails), so I
>>> think you should choose one and push it.  Then we can cancel all the builds
>>> on the master branch until that commit.
>>
>> Anyway, here's the simpler patch...    Let's call it approach #3.
>>
>> Approach #1 - add -Ignulib
>> Approach #2 - add wrapper config.h files in the source dirs
>> Approach #3 - rename support-config.h -> config.h
> 
> I'd say let's go for #3, since that's how gdb and gdbserver already work,
> it's been working well for years, so it's proven already.

I've merged #3 now.  We discussed adding a comment to
gdbsupport/Makefile.am about the order of include paths, but it
turns out that the -I. is added by automake by default
(DEFAULT_INCLUDES), not explicitly set.  gdb and gdbserver's
Makefile.in have comments about it already.  So I applied the
patch as it was.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves