[Regression] [PATCH] Do not print empty-group regs when printing general ones
Luis Machado
luis.machado@linaro.org
Fri Feb 28 13:08:00 GMT 2020
On 1/31/20 7:34 AM, Shahab Vahedi wrote:
> This patch was reviewed once (as OK):
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2020-01/msg00613.html
>
> Could someone review/merge it?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Shahab
>
FTR, this has broken general register printing for ARM/AArch64. Now
"info reg" shows nothing.
Given there are already remote stubs, probes and gdbservers running out
there, this is an undesirable change to have.
I had an IRC chat with Christian and he pointed me at some documentation
stating empty-group registers should not be printed, but i think this is
a case where the implementation has diverged from the documentation.
https://sourceware.org/gdb/current/onlinedocs/gdb/Target-Description-Format.html#Target-Description-Format
We could probably patch up any non-standard target description XML's
from now on, but the existing behavior may have to be preserved.
I haven't investigated this in depth yet to determine what can/should
change.
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list