[PATCH 2/3 v2] Define _KMEMUSER in arm-nbsd-nat.c

[Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches]

On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 7:38 AM Christian Biesinger
<cbiesinger@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 5:37 PM Kamil Rytarowski <n54@gmx.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 24.01.2020 17:01, Christian Biesinger wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 4:49 PM Kamil Rytarowski <n54@gmx.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 24.01.2020 16:35, Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 4:23 PM Kamil Rytarowski <n54@gmx.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 24.01.2020 15:53, Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi Kamil,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I have a related question. NetBSD applied this patch:
> > >>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/tech@openbsd.org/msg44100.html
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Is this the right link?
> > >>>
> > >>> Yeah -- that patch changes a system header at the top and patches GDB
> > >>> at the bottom.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> This is not a change in NetBSD, so it is unrelated.
> > >
> > > My apologies, I completely misread that. I'll see if I can find where
> > > NetBSD changed their FP register data structure, or perhaps your
> > > downstream patch will still work (although that probably has to come
> > > from one of y'all for copyright reasons?)
> > >
> >
> > Please cherry-pick what you need and I will find the original author.
> > Many people in NetBSD have FSF papers done.
>
> Thanks. I think this patch would probably be the most important since
> it fixes a compile error:
> https://github.com/NetBSD/pkgsrc-wip/blob/master/gdb-netbsd/patches/patch-gdb_arm-nbsd-nat.c
>
> However, I don't understand why arm_netbsd_core_fns /
> fetch_core_registers was added. As far as I can tell, because that
> struct uses bfd_target_unknown_flavour and default_core_sniffer, it
> will never be used.

Hi Kamil,

I also filed https://github.com/NetBSD/pkgsrc-wip/issues/17 on some
patches that can be dropped, and I upstreamed a couple of
trivial/obvious patches you had.

Christian