Propose we release GDB 9.1 next weekend (Feb 01-02)

[Simon Marchi]

On 2020-02-01 7:57 a.m., Jonah Graham wrote:
> Can fullname field (at least in MI output) continue to be
> realpath_fullname concept and if needed in MI a new field added for
> absolute_fullname? In the CLI output users see just file
> (../src/main2.c), but that is not generally useful in the IDE case as
> it is display only.

The MI documentation doesn't say anything about what that fullname field should
contain, in fact it's just shown in examples and never formally described.

But given that it has contained the realpath for years, this is what the IDEs/users
expect, so I indeed think we should make sure it stays that way.

> Tom If you decide to revert (which would be my preference) I will
> happily work with you to get this back in. I previously wrote a
> testcase for the simple case that did already get fixed, I can work on
> a testcase for the new case too for the suite if it helps.
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-08/msg00421.html

Thanks, that will be useful.

Simon