[RFC PATCH] gdb: introduce xfer_partial_ctx object
John Baldwin
jhb@FreeBSD.org
Mon Aug 17 16:03:27 GMT 2020
On 8/16/20 2:45 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2020-08-15 12:26 p.m., John Baldwin wrote:
>> I think the idea is fine. In some places you can perhaps avoid auto if
>> you just pass xfer_partial_ctx::foo () directly as a function argument.
>
> Right, I was probably trying to avoid extra long/wrapped lines. I thought
> "auto" was ok here, because the type name is already mentioned on the line
> (although one has to know that the return type of the "make_*" static method
> is also xfer_partial_ctx, that's not necessarily obvious).
To be clear, I do think these places would be an "ok" use of auto given our
other discussions on that topic as a larger group.
--
John Baldwin
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list