[patch] [gdb/testsuite] XFAIL under Clang tests using label debug info
Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Fri Sep 6 02:48:00 GMT 2019
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 5:12 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Clang now supports labels - so I'd like to essentially revert this patch.
Out of curiosity, when did clang get support for this?
Christian
> Is this OK?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:23 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
> > > David Blaikie writes:
> > > > Clang doesn't emit debug info for labels (Clang PR14500). XFAIL a
> > > > bunch of GDB tests that rely on debug info for labels.
> > > >
> > > > For some reason gdb.linespec/ls-expr.exp gathered all tests into a
> > > > dictionary and then ran them. This made it hard to XFAIL just the
> > > > right tests. I refactored this to execute the tests directly, removing
> > > > the dictionary so I could XFAIL the right tests. Is there a reason it
> > > > would've been written that way? Does my patch break it in some way?
> > > > commit c438cb16b63292e415330f289616c4e4ecece63c
> > > > Author: David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
> > > > Date: Sun Apr 13 11:42:02 2014 -0700
> > > >
> > > > XFAIL under Clang tests using labels
> > > >
> > > > gdb/testsuite/
> > > > * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under Clang.
> > > > * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
> > > > * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute directly
> > > > and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
> > >
> > > LGTM
> > >
> > > > diff --git gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > > > index 730c116..b04b940 100644
> > > > --- gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > > > +++ gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > > > @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
> > > > +2014-04-12 David Blaikie <dblaikie@gmail.com>
> > > > +
> > > > + * gdb.base/label.exp: XFAIL label related tests under Clang.
> > > > + * gdb.cp/cplabel.exp: Ditto.
> > > > + * gdb.linespec/ls-errs.exp: Refactor tests to execute directly and XFAIL under Clang those using labels.
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Nit: space vs tabs. Just use tabs.
> > > Plus line is longer than 80 chars.
> >
> > Thanks for the catches - fixed those up and committed in
> > c2e827ad5340fcf1735df6c77cb0311e56b985ef.
> >
> > Also refactored some of the xfails along the lines of what Pedro
> > suggested in the one test case that had several similar failures
> > (gdb.base/label.exp). If/when we fix this in Clang it might be worth
> > refactoring into a common function (though I'm personally not very
> > vested in keeping the test suite usable with anything other than ToT
> > Clang - perhaps others are).
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list