[PATCH 2/2] Update breakpoint_1's documentation
Pedro Alves
palves@redhat.com
Wed Jul 10 15:40:00 GMT 2019
Spotted a tiny typo.
On 7/10/19 2:51 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> static int
> -breakpoint_1 (const char *args, int allflag,
> +breakpoint_1 (const char *bp_num_list, bool show_internal,
> int (*filter) (const struct breakpoint *))
> {
> struct breakpoint *b;
> @@ -6431,17 +6437,17 @@ breakpoint_1 (const char *args, int allflag,
> if (filter && !filter (b))
> continue;
>
> - /* If we have an "args" string, it is a list of breakpoints to
> + /* If we have an "bp_num_list" string, it is a list of breakpoints to
The "an" should now be "a" now.
Maybe switch to UPPERCASE while at it:
"have a BP_NUM_LIST string"
> accept. Skip the others. */
> - if (args != NULL && *args != '\0')
> + if (bp_num_list != NULL && *bp_num_list != '\0')
> {
> @@ -6500,26 +6506,26 @@ breakpoint_1 (const char *args, int allflag,
> if (filter && !filter (b))
> continue;
>
> - /* If we have an "args" string, it is a list of breakpoints to
> + /* If we have an "bp_num_list" string, it is a list of breakpoints to
> accept. Skip the others. */
>
Ditto.
Thanks,
Pedro Alves
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list