[RFA] Fix leaks in macro definitions.
Philippe Waroquiers
philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be
Sat Jan 19 17:32:00 GMT 2019
On Thu, 2019-01-17 at 15:24 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > > > > > "Tom" == Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> writes:
> > > > > > "Philippe" == Philippe Waroquiers <philippe.waroquiers@skynet.be> writes:
>
> Philippe> Deciding for a fix in splay tree for sure implies
> Philippe> more discussions (no idea who knows where libiberty is used).
>
> Tom> This isn't typically a consideration for libiberty. It's not released
> Tom> separately from the gcc and binutils-gdb trees, so if someone else out
> Tom> there is using it, they need to keep watch over what they do when they
> Tom> start using a new version.
>
> BTW, I can send a patch to gcc if you would prefer.
Yes, if the below patch is ok, it would be really nice if you could send
it to gcc:
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2019-01/msg00437.html
(of course, fix/update the patch as you wish/as needed).
Thanks
Philippe
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list