[PATCH] review request: implementing DW_AT_endianity

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Peeter" == Peeter Joot <peeter.joot@gmail.com> writes:

Peeter> I'm still holding the patch for submission.  I'd handled all the reviewer
Peeter> comments I received, implemented the tests suggestion by the reviewers, and
Peeter> verified that I introduced no test regressions.  Also, the gcc side issues
Peeter> I noticed testing this are already fixed in the latest version (trunk, but
Peeter> perhaps one of the releases now too).

Peeter> Unfortunately, the FSF attribution required for me to submit this formally
Peeter> on behalf of the company I work for has been delayed repeatedly.  The last
Peeter> I heard from the company lawyer who was arranging the attribution is that
Peeter> there's just a few more i's and t's to dot and cross, but it should be done
Peeter> soon.

Hi!  What is the status of this?  I'm still interested in getting this
patch into gdb.

thanks,
Tom