How to disable GDB backtrace new behavior of including disassembly in backtrace ?
Andrew Burgess
andrew.burgess@embecosm.com
Wed Dec 25 21:34:00 GMT 2019
* Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de> [2019-12-25 19:50:59 +0000]:
> On 2019-12-13 7:09 a.m., William Tambe wrote:
> > How to disable GDB backtrace new behavior of including disassembly in
> > backtrace ?
> >
> > I have built GDB 8.3 and here is an example of output that I now see:
> >
> > bt
> > #0 0x0005ed42 in set_next_entity (se=<optimized out>,
> > cfs_rq=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> > 0x0005ed38 <pick_next_task_fair+492>: 80 74 li8 %7, 0x4 # 4
> > 0x0005ed3a <pick_next_task_fair+494>: b8 70 add %7, %sp
> > 0x0005ed3c <pick_next_task_fair+496>: ea 37 ld32 %3, %7
> > 0x0005ed3e <pick_next_task_fair+498>: c7 13 cpy %1, %3
> > 0x0005ed40 <pick_next_task_fair+500>: 92 10 inc8 %1, 32 # 0x20
> > => 0x0005ed42 <pick_next_task_fair+502>: ea 11 ld32 %1, %1
> > 0x0005ed44 <pick_next_task_fair+504>: ea 50 ld32 %5, %sp
> > 0x0005ed46 <pick_next_task_fair+506>: e0 d0 gip %sr
> > 0x0005ed48 <pick_next_task_fair+508>: a2 d0 4e 00 00 00
> > inc32 %sr, 78 # 0x4e
> > 0x0005ed4e <pick_next_task_fair+514>: d1 1d jnz %1, %sr
> > #1 pick_next_task_fair (rq=<optimized out>, prev=<optimized out>,
> > rf=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> >
> > Using an earlier version of GDB would have just shown two lines
> > without disassembly; ie:
> >
> > bt
> > #0 0x0005ed42 in set_next_entity (se=<optimized out>,
> > cfs_rq=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> > #1 pick_next_task_fair (rq=<optimized out>, prev=<optimized out>,
> > rf=<optimized out>) at /linux/kernel/sched/fair.c:6844
> >
> > How can I restore the GDB old behavior when using backtrace ?
> >
>
> do you have "set disassemble-next-line on" ?
> what is your setting of "show print frame-info" ?
> I believe that previously this setting was only used in bt when
> set print frame-info source-line / source-and-location
>
> Not sure if that was changed intentionally or not, it seems as if
> this commit moved the do_gdb_disassemble out of the
> "if (source_print && sal.symtab)" block, see:
>
> commit ec8e2b6d3051f0b4b2a8eee9917898e95046c62f
> Author: Andrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>
> Date: Fri Jun 14 23:43:00 2019 +0100
>
> gdb: Don't allow annotations to influence what else GDB prints
I'm pretty sure I didn't mean for any change in that sort of
behaviour. I'll try to take a look at this as soon as possible, that
might be tomorrow, or possibly the day after.
Thanks,
Andrew
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list