[PATCH 5/7] jit: make gdb_object::symtabs a vector of unique_ptr

Pedro Alves palves@redhat.com
Fri Dec 13 19:42:00 GMT 2019


On 12/13/19 6:51 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2019-12-13 1:45 p.m., Simon Marchi wrote:
>> I don't think so.  We return these pointers to the JIT debug readers, which then pass
>> it back to the block_open and symtab_close callbacks.  It's important that the objects
>> don't move during their lifetime.  If we had a vector of objects, the pointers we return
>> to the user would get invalidated the moment the vector is resized.
> 
> Actually, it would be good to document this, so we don't change it to a vector of
> objects, out of good intention.  I would add this to document the gdb_object::symtabs
> field:
> 
>   /* Symtabs of this object.
> 
>      This is a vector of pointers, rather than a vector of objects, because the
>      pointers are returned to the user's debug info reader, so it's important
>      that the objects don't change location during their lifetime (which would
>      happen with a vector of objects getting resized.  */
> 
> I would add a similar comment later in the series to document gdb_symtab::blocks.

That looks good to me.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves



More information about the Gdb-patches mailing list