[PATCH] Fix Fortran regression with variables in nested functions
Kevin Buettner
kevinb@redhat.com
Wed Aug 14 22:04:00 GMT 2019
On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 12:26:24 -0600
Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> wrote:
> Sergio pointed out that commit commit aa3b6533 ("Allow nested function
> displays") regressed a few gdb.fortran tests. I was able to reproduce
> these failures with gcc head.
>
> The bug is that some spots calling contained_in will in fact do the
> wrong thing if nested functions are considered as contained. In the
> particular case of the Fortran regression, it was the call in
> block_innermost_frame, being called from get_hosting_frame -- in this
> case, the caller is specifically trying to avoid the nested case.
>
> This patch fixes the problem by adding an "allow_nested" parameter to
> contained_in, essentially reverting the change for most callers.
>
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 2019-08-13 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
>
> * printcmd.c (do_one_display, info_display_command): Update.
> * block.h (contained_in): Return bool. Add allow_nested
> parameter.
> * block.c (contained_in): Return bool. Add allow_nested
> parameter.
This patch fixes regressions that I was seeing in my OpenMP work,
so I'm in favor of it going in.
Kevin
More information about the Gdb-patches
mailing list