[PATCH] Also recognize __sighndlr on Solaris/x86

[Simon Marchi]

On 2018-09-19 8:56 a.m., Rainer Orth wrote:
> Unlike Solaris/SPARC, the __sighndlr function isn't recognized as part
> of a signal handler, causing a couple of testcases to fail.
> 
> The following patch fixes that.  A followup patch will move this to
> common code to avoid such unnecessary discrepancies between
> Solaris/SPARC and x86 in the future.
> 
> While this fixes a couple of backtraces to now correctly print
> 
> #1  <signal handler called>
> 
> they often fail later with
> 
> #2  0x0ff3ffffff00857f in ?? ()
> Backtrace stopped: Cannot access memory at address 0xff3000002e0886f
> 
> which needs further investigation.
> 
> Tested on amd64-pc-solaris2.11 (running the tests with both -m64 and
> -m32).  Ok for master?
> 
> 	Rainer
> 

I noticed this had not been replied to, this LGTM.  I don't know much about
Solaris, but I trust that you know what you are talking about :) and this
looks pretty straightforward.

Simon